spongehammer's Recent Forum Activity

- spongehammer
- - Joined 30 Oct, 2012
  - 92 topics • 1,088 posts
- 1
- 25 Apr, 2015
- Quote
I am exporting to NW.js. its not an HTML project.

Just tried it as a web export. the Chrome console says:

Document was loaded from Application Cache with manifest http://www.mailtree.co.uk/temp/offline.appcache

(index):1 Application Cache Checking event

(index):118 Uncaught (in promise) DOMException: Only secure origins are allowed. http://goo.gl/lq4gCo {message: "Only secure origins are allowed. http://goo.gl/lq4gCo", name: "NotSupportedError", code: 9, INDEX_SIZE_ERR: 1, DOMSTRING_SIZE_ERR: 2â€¦}(anonymous function) (index):118

(index):1 Application Cache NoUpdate event

c2runtime.js:94 Uncaught (in promise) DOMException: A call to lockOrientation() or unlockOrientation() canceled this call. {message: "A call to lockOrientation() or unlockOrientation() canceled this call.", name: "AbortError", code: 20, INDEX_SIZE_ERR: 1, DOMSTRING_SIZE_ERR: 2â€¦}l.qr c2runtime.js:94l.xv c2runtime.js:89l.Uj c2runtime.js:103l.Cw.Cg.a.onload c2runtime.js:81

www.mailtree.co.uk/:1 Uncaught (in promise) DOMException: lockOrientation() is not available on this device. {message: "lockOrientation() is not available on this device.", name: "NotSupportedError", code: 9, INDEX_SIZE_ERR: 1, DOMSTRING_SIZE_ERR: 2â€¦}

c2runtime.js:408 Uncaught ReferenceError: tri is not defined

No idea what any of that means or if its relevent. <img src="{SMILIES_PATH}/icon_e_smile.gif" alt=":)" title="Smile">
- spongehammer
- - Joined 30 Oct, 2012
  - 92 topics • 1,088 posts
- 1
- 25 Apr, 2015
- Quote
R0J0hound
The minifier still doesnt work for me. Just a black screen. I am also using Paster in the same project, could it be that ?

Thanks
Try Construct 3

Develop games in your browser. Powerful, performant & highly capable.
Try Now Construct 3 users don't see these ads
- spongehammer
- - Joined 30 Oct, 2012
  - 92 topics • 1,088 posts
- 1
- 19 Apr, 2015
- Quote
FTP capabilities

+100
- spongehammer
- - Joined 30 Oct, 2012
  - 92 topics • 1,088 posts
- 1
- 17 Apr, 2015
- Quote
Ha well i meant better than previous Chrome versions. Unfortunately IE11 isnt in NW.js
- spongehammer
- - Joined 30 Oct, 2012
  - 92 topics • 1,088 posts
- 1
- 17 Apr, 2015
- Quote
Seems a bit better on my machine. Obviously needs more testing but lets hope it is better than previous versions.
- spongehammer
- - Joined 30 Oct, 2012
  - 92 topics • 1,088 posts
- 1
- 17 Apr, 2015
- Quote
Irbis
Read the thread, I already answered.

The thread was simply a statement about how i felt when i went to start a new project then got reminded straight away about the poor performance of C2/Chrome/NW.js

There was no intention to start a long debate about it because we have heard it all before and nothing gets done.
You do not have permission to view this post
- spongehammer
- - Joined 30 Oct, 2012
  - 92 topics • 1,088 posts
- 1
- 15 Apr, 2015
- Quote
I like the sound of jayderyu's idea. It seems to make more sense and seems more flexible.
- spongehammer
- - Joined 30 Oct, 2012
  - 92 topics • 1,088 posts
- 1
- 14 Apr, 2015
- Quote
I wouldnt waste my time even thinking about it.
- spongehammer
- - Joined 30 Oct, 2012
  - 92 topics • 1,088 posts
- 1
- 14 Apr, 2015
- Quote
Yes they do. Physics is just a behavior and doesnt alter the sprite in any other way.
- spongehammer
- - Joined 30 Oct, 2012
  - 92 topics • 1,088 posts
- 1
- 13 Apr, 2015
- Quote
—
As i recall R0J0hound says it should work. I dont think the performance will be any better though. Not tried it myself.
- spongehammer
- - Joined 30 Oct, 2012
  - 92 topics • 1,088 posts
- 1
- 13 Apr, 2015
- Quote
Plays well in Firefox and Chrome. Its a little frustrating trying to let go of the rope and when you do you cant grab it again on the way down. Otherwise its looking nice.