> > just provide a cool dark skin ..
> What is wrong with the dark skin that exist?
It's pretty ugly. Game Maker Studio 2 is getting a really nice looking dark UI. Other good examples are Pyxel Edit and Adobe's software (aesthetically only, the functionality of the UI should be kept simple, unlike Adobe's).
C2's UI works really well. But cosmetics also matter (to some of us). A good looking UI can boost sales to new users of Construct
Having the idea of Construct 3 in a UI with the same properties of Adobe is something i can agree on considering that it will be lightweight as possible but something like GameMaker 2's UI, that is the worst move yet.
Many people including me don't like that bloated UI of GameMaker 2. I rather have a lightweight software that is efficient even if it's not flashy as long as it doesn't compensate on decreasing the feature list.
So in other words, many people don't like GameMaker2's UI because of those unnecessary memory, cpu and especially network usage. You'll understand this if you have tried the GM2 Beta. So please Scirra Team, make C3 as lightweight as possible but not so far that it will affect the feature list. Just make it cool and light.