EDIT:upon reading my post, I think my post seems kind of unfair I think, not sure, If it does feels like it, sorry, that wasn't the expected result
jayderyu : I like the way you are thinking, it brings hope and is still reasonable, C2 does HTML5 well, and the HTML5 is cross-platform, from what I've tried, this is not a lie, but like anything else, it has compatibility problems (exe have too before someone say otherwise).
Also It seems there is a pattern, like every two month a big topic "C2 bad performances, it is bad" comes, with valid or invalid arguments depending of each topic, but mostly I wonder if people use C2 as it is meant to be, an HTML5 game engine that get rid of the programming, but not the design (I don't say that the presentation of the program is perfect on the homepage, but it is what it really is)
Also it seems everyone tries cocoonJS because it is the "best performance wise", which is wrong IMO, for JS execution maybe, but I always see the main complaint is it is bad at everything else it seems, I thought scirra stopped to support cocoonJS because of that + bad communication can anyone confirm or invalidate that?
To stop this kind of complaint I do:
-Yes I love C2, No it isn't perfect, but it will improve, it has already improved, a lot, do what you want, I stay personnally, there is improvement to be done, well, how can we help then?
Also I would love to see your performances reports, and remember to code it well ^-^