I'm sorry but why do you keep referring to construct 3 I never mentioned it lol and it is not the same case idk where that idea came from
I obviously said this. with the drawback of losing the easy drag-n-drop, event-sheets, fast prototype benefits and etc., even if we are not talking about Construct 3, it is still the same case.
You obviously can't easily make a 3D game from a layout. It requires 3 dimensions, not 2.
I think the better approach to this is to present a case to convince the Construct Team or any 2D Game Engine developers. Because, if it was that easy, why didn't Unity do it already... With all their resources.
I'm confused what do you mean??
It means, what you are asking for may be too ambitious with nothing to back up the feasibility. And compared 2 very different engines. Because, Buildbox is a template engine and Engines like Construct 3 are generalized engines. You are confused because as you said, you haven't read about Buildbox, you only focused on the part they made a 3D game.
Here is what you said:
I was looking into buildbox and saw that they made a 3d version of their game engine.
I will make it as simple as possible to avoid confusing you. Here is an answer to your original question:
Would anyone like a 3d version of construct soon?
Yes. Of course. But it surely wouldn't be happening soon. A Game Engine attempted that before, and it shut downed.