Construct 3 any news?

    Don't close it, it's a good topic!

    Don't close it, it's a good topic!

    Nope all fine, Ashley gave him the red card for now.

    Ashley I have searched and combed the forums and tutorials and have found nothing except for this vague reference. Where is the official information on the feature you referenced? https://www.scirra.com/tutorials/5372/w ... wjs/page-2

  • Try Construct 3

    Develop games in your browser. Powerful, performant & highly capable.

    Try Now Construct 3 users don't see these ads

    Look guys I honestly took a step back and realized something. No company will work on something for a year and not release any information on it. C3 does not exist so focus on the here and now.

    That happens when the scope of the project changes significantly.

    Would still be great to hear any news about it (no details about features or something like that).

    But teasers?!

    Or aprox. release date (6 months, 1 year, 2 years, 5 years...)

    Or aprox. release date for alpha / beta so we can help to mold the outcome with actual feedback.

    Something to look forward to.

    I have subscribed by mail to the news on day 1.

    Yet haven't recieved even one mail yet.

    What I'd really like to know, if not already discussed. Is Construct 2 going to be retired once it hits a certain build with no more support or are Construct 2 and 3 going to be updated side by side?

    What I'd really like to know, if not already discussed. Is Construct 2 going to be retired once it hits a certain build with no more support or are Construct 2 and 3 going to be updated side by side?

    As far as I know it will be updated, but no new features can be expected.

    Would still be great to hear any news about it (no details about features or something like that).

    But teasers?!

    Or aprox. release date (6 months, 1 year, 2 years, 5 years...)

    Or aprox. release date for alpha / beta so we can help to mold the outcome with actual feedback.

    Something to look forward to.

    I have subscribed by mail to the news on day 1.

    Yet haven't recieved even one mail yet.

    I am only guessing. About a year ago, I suggested a sweeping change to C3 that I am guessing they took. If they did, it would explain the significant development time though.

    I emailed them a few weeks ago about it, but their lips were sealed up like Fort Knox.

    About a year ago, I suggested a sweeping change to C3 that I am guessing they took.

    What would this sweeping change be?

    > About a year ago, I suggested a sweeping change to C3 that I am guessing they took.

    >

    What would this sweeping change be?

    That they split C3 up into two major versions: Game & Enterprise. C3:Game would be focused on canvas-based JavaScript abstraction (their previous idea of C3), while C3:Enterprise would be focused on non-canvas JavaScript abstraction. The Enterprise version would contain things like site formatting, tables, authentication, database access, caching, among other things. They would also be able to do C3:Ultimate, which would contain both Game & Enterprise versions.

    This would multiply their potential market by a thousand-fold, and they would be competing with platforms like Google WebToolkit and Web Builder 11, etc.

    But like I said before, this is purely conjecture.

    >

    > > About a year ago, I suggested a sweeping change to C3 that I am guessing they took.

    > >

    >

    > What would this sweeping change be?

    >

    That they split C3 up into two major versions: Game & Enterprise. C3:Game would be focused on canvas-based JavaScript abstraction (their previous idea of C3), while C3:Enterprise would be focused on non-canvas JavaScript abstraction. The Enterprise version would contain things like site formatting, tables, authentication, database access, caching, among other things. They would also be able to do C3:Ultimate, which would contain both Game & Enterprise versions.

    This would multiply their potential market by a thousand-fold, and they would be competing with platforms like Google WebToolkit and Web Builder 11, etc.

    But like I said before, this is purely conjecture.

    Whether they do that or not, it's a pretty solid idea.

    Whether they do that or not, it's a pretty solid idea.

    Thanks. I thought so too. :-p

    I also have no better guess as to why they would be taking so long for a "reskin" of Construct2.

    gumshoe2029

    I heard that the (game) engine will not changed before, only rebuilt whole of IDE.

    i think the problem with people talking about c3 (i include myself there) is that, c3 was announced maybe before reaching a stable build, do we know since when is the scirra team working on C3? because if they started working on it the day they announced it, then we will have to wait 2 more years...

    i think the problem with people talking about c3 (i include myself there) is that, c3 was announced maybe before reaching a stable build, do we know since when is the scirra team working on C3? because if they started working on it the day they announced it, then we will have to wait 2 more years...

    I promise you that people would've noticed that the updates got cut shorter than usual, so I think it's a good thing that we got to know why.

    To all the news requests, I can only agree with you guys.

    I mean we don't need a whole book about the most recent features that have been added to C3.

    Tweets like: "Hey it was a pain to add * feature for Linux but I finally got it running!", would be enough news for me

    personally and you can't deny that a short tweet like that would cost more than a minute.

Jump to:
Active Users
There are 1 visitors browsing this topic (0 users and 1 guests)