index based

This forum is currently in read-only mode.

Replies Disabled

❤Follow Topic(6)

0 favourites

9 posts

From the Asset Store

Gif

Advanced Inventory (Array-based) for your RPG game

$16.99 USD

Advanced inventory mechanics for your RPG game (Array-based). Take Items, split them, pick up them, read the description

AferisT

- Doppel
- - Joined 19 Jan, 2008
  - 29 topics • 718 posts
- 1
- 28 Jul, 2009
- Quote
How about we get back to 0-index based and not 0-index based with some things with 1-index based which supposed to make things easier for new construct users but it doesnt seem to work pretty good also annoys people with basic programming knowlage.
- madster
- - Joined 17 Feb, 2009
  - 77 topics • 1,412 posts
- 1
- 29 Jul, 2009
- Quote
what?
- Mipey
- - Joined 16 Jan, 2009
  - 97 topics • 1,858 posts
- 1
- 29 Jul, 2009
- Quote
I thought we all had discussed this in another thread... The point is to make everything uniform, as mixing 0-index and 1-index based features is too confusing, there would be MANY errors on the game developer's part. Imagine bug requests "MY GAEM NO WORK WYYYYYYY" etc. and it turns out some object is using different indexing etc.

You can always add -1 to the 1-indexed stuff to make it 0, but that'd be complicating it needlessly. Sometimes we have to agree on a standard to stick to. 1 indexing is the chosen one.
- Ashley Construct Team Founder
- Moderator
- - Joined 21 May, 2007
  - 667 topics • 30,055 posts
- 1
- 29 Jul, 2009
- Quote
Everything in Construct should be 1-based (loops, lists, arrays etc) except where manually specified (eg. you can still specify a For loop to run from 0 to 9, it's not going to change that). If you find anything operating as 0-based, report it as a bug - obviously we don't want a mixed indexing standard!
- Doppel
- - Joined 19 Jan, 2008
  - 29 topics • 718 posts
- 1
- 29 Jul, 2009
- Quote
Everything in Construct should be 1-based (loops, lists, arrays etc) except where manually specified (eg. you can still specify a For loop to run from 0 to 9, it's not going to change that). If you find anything operating as 0-based, report it as a bug - obviously we don't want a mixed indexing standard!

random() function reporting as bugged.
Try Construct 3

Develop games in your browser. Powerful, performant & highly capable.
Try Now Construct 3 users don't see these ads
- Ashley Construct Team Founder
- Moderator
- - Joined 21 May, 2007
  - 667 topics • 30,055 posts
- 1
- 29 Jul, 2009
- Quote
Oh... we had a discussion about that a while back, and decided not to change it. It'd break so many .caps in annoying ways. I think that one's the exception to the rule
- Davioware
- - Joined 25 Sep, 2008
  - 64 topics • 1,196 posts
- 1
- 29 Jul, 2009
- Quote
wait... how is random() bugged?
- linkman2004
- - Joined 15 Jan, 2008
  - 98 topics • 1,576 posts
- 1
- 29 Jul, 2009
- Quote
wait... how is random() bugged?

If you put random(10), it will return a number between 0 and 9 rather than 1 and 10. Though that's not so much bugged as it is a standard programming thing.
- Doppel
- - Joined 19 Jan, 2008
  - 29 topics • 718 posts
- 1
- 29 Jul, 2009
- Quote
> wait... how is random() bugged?

>

If you put random(10), it will return a number between 0 and 9 rather than 1 and 10. Though that's not so much bugged as it is a standard programming thing.

It should be index 1 based, i dont choose numbers to random pick, just range of numbers.

Edit:

Also if its index 0 based why it cant pick number 10 in random(10)