Compiling into diferent files

This forum is currently in read-only mode.
  • When compiling Construct builds a unique EXE. I twould be great to be able to create diferent kind os datastoring files... for example: (would contain all the pictures and graphics) (sounds and music) (all the rest)

    the exe file would be only a linking file... for instance.

    ... this would turn the exe file smaller and the project would also be more organized. Maybe it is nothing important... but load times would be shorter because... only the needed graphics would be loaded from file, and RAM would be spared (or so I think)

    (this was also anonther way to protect the game data... I'm seeing game where the sounds stay in a folder... and can be easly obtained)

  • You can already load graphic, and sound resources externally, and have access to store in .ini for game data.

  • Currently all the data is just embedded to the EXE. Using external data files would not make the total amount of data you need to send out smaller, it wouldn't be faster, either, and I doubt it would save memory. So I don't see much reason to do this I'm afraid

  • Try Construct 3

    Develop games in your browser. Powerful, performant & highly capable.

    Try Now Construct 3 users don't see these ads
  • With external data sources it allows modification of game data without the need to recompile the entire EXE... super useful for pipeline development with umm... everbody else in the world. From a data-protection and project perspective its useful to have a out-of-the-box storage option like this that artists can use asynchronously from coders to add data like big background images, music, videos, other misc stuff to a project without the need to make a 400mb project file that takes 30 minutes to save/recompile.

    Yes - I understand its possible to store that data in its individual files and use INI's in a folder but it is "Cleaner" to have it in a protect-able archive with easy access via Construct. My suggestion is to modify the ZIP object to be able to extract/import files from a password protected ZIP - solves everybody's woes on this one.

  • I think this is good idea though I already store levels,music and sounds externally. But those who aren't familiar with INI's it would be easier to add new levels without having to compile everything well it would be easier to patch games and add new stuff.

  • zip password support would be nice

    at least for decompression

  • I just wanted to add my support for this kind of system.

    As Construct doesn�t seem to have any kind of patch system for bug-patching finished projects (correct me if I�m wrong) it would be smart to keep the .exe file size as low as possible to reduce download-time for users. At the same time, I would rather not have all graphics spread out in folders, I want them to feel safe in a file somewhere.

    Also, it would be great if you could have "families" for your graphics, so that at a layout start up you could tell the game to load a certain family file, and all it�s graphics gets loaded, like, you know, "load snowy landscape tileset" and such.

    Basically, you import you graphics, give it a family name, a file is created which stores every graphics of that family in that file, and then you would load the family at layout start up. Wouldn�t that be handy?

  • This would be ideal. A group could work on a project much more easily. Say for example your Music/Sound guy gave you placeholder sounds that are not final in anyway. Now lets say the person maintaining the project goes away and the sound guy wants to update these sounds and he does not have the *.cap. How will he test these new sounds without recompiling? In short, he can't.

    If we had archives of files, INSTEAD of in folder (the folder method I really don't like due to scum stealing art/music/sounds) it would not only allow people to work on the game much more easily (if there was some type of encryption). But also prevent some what I call "script kiddies" from using your hard work elsewhere.

    The *.exe should be as small as possible in my opinion.


Jump to:
Active Users
There are 1 visitors browsing this topic (0 users and 1 guests)