Ok look at this CAPX and pay special attention to how
1) I created a Dictionary
2) Saved the UID for the Dictionary
3) Re-"picked " that same Dictionary by UID later on and got its data
There are other ways of doing things but this is how I always do it... basically in my mind the UID is a pointer to a specific instance like in C++ coding.
Here comes my weird question about scope, and hopefully this is what I'm being tripped up on (I have implemented this yet, but purely in terms of the environment):
If I only have one Dictionary object, wouldn't
All yeild the same results when picking?
I made your example look more like mine and you're right, it broke. Am I understanding how it picks incorrectly? Sorry to bug you The question is open ended to anyone