C2 performance still depressing

0 favourites
From the Asset Store
Firebase: Analytics, Dynamic Links, Remote Config, Performance, Crashlytics on Android, iOS & Web Browser
  • 10% sounds like a great boost, if it's the difference between even 59fps and 60fps it may be all that's needed to remove the strangeness that occurs in platform behaviour.

  • Try Construct 3

    Develop games in your browser. Powerful, performant & highly capable.

    Try Now Construct 3 users don't see these ads
  • spongehammer

    [quote:35210fq0] I dont want to start another long debate about what Scirra should or shouldnt do as there are a number of those threads already running.

    So, if this isn't about what you want Scirra to do.. what do you want? (Serious question)

    Ummm yeah. I actually don't get that too.

  • Read the thread, I already answered.

    The thread was simply a statement about how i felt when i went to start a new project then got reminded straight away about the poor performance of C2/Chrome/NW.js

    There was no intention to start a long debate about it because we have heard it all before and nothing gets done.

  • Read the thread, I already answered.

    The thread was simply a statement about how i felt when i went to start a new project then got reminded straight away about the poor performance of C2/Chrome/NW.js

    There was no intention to start a long debate about it because we have heard it all before and nothing gets done.

    I still don't get it. So this is a rant thread just for venting?

    bear in mind - I am not trolling or anything

    And I did read it from the ground up.

  • 10% sounds good. I think you should try it out. Also, if you can get the engine to use multiple cores, you can advertise it as such

Jump to:
Active Users
There are 1 visitors browsing this topic (0 users and 1 guests)